PENSION vs NO PENSION

MP’s HAVE PENSION,

WHY NOT TO EMPLOYEES?

AS PER THE MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT PENSION RULE 2010, EVERY MP’S WHO EVEN TOUCHED THE HOUSE WERE ELIGIBLE FOR Rs. 20000/PER MONTH PENSION.

     WHY IT NOT APLICABLE TO AN EMPLOYEE WHO SERVED MORE THAN 30 YEARS.

WHY THE CONTRIBUTORY PENSION SCHEME FOR THEM? AND SENDING TO SHARE PLAY? .

THE RULE STATED THAT:

With effect from the 18th day of May, 2009, there shall be paid a pension of twenty thousand rupees per month to every person who has served for any period as a Member of the Provisional Parliament or either House of Parliament

Provided that where a person has served as a Member of the Provisional Parliament or either House of Parliament for a period exceeding five years, there shall be paid to him an additional pension of fifteen hundred rupees per month for every year served in excess of five year.

DEAR COMRADES, REALIZE THE INJUSTICE AND